High-Level Expert Group Meeting
10-11 February 1990
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Chaired by Miguel de la Madrid Hurtado
THE ECOLOGICAL CRISIS A CHALLENGE TO THE GLOBAL
ECONOMY
1. Since the early 1970s, the world has increasingly
become sensitized to environmental issues. Today, an
ecological crisis of many dimensions is looming which
affects all countries and could jeopardize the globe's
life-support systems. It is characterized by a depletion
of the ozone layer; a substantial accumulation of
greenhouse gases inducing climate change; accelerating
degradation of air, land and water quality; accumulation
of industrial and household wastes; depletion of the
earth's natural resource base and loss of biodiversity.
High rates of population growth and poverty in developing
countries and wasteful consumption and energy use patterns
in industrialized countries are the root causes of these
developments. Unless a markedly different mode of economic
activity is introduced, the sustainability of the
ecosystems on which the world economy depends may be
endangered.
2. The effectiveness of ecological policies will greatly
depend on the ability to curb and reduce world population
growth and an improved distribution of the population
within each country.
3. Environmental problems are multi-dimensional and can
only be solved by multi-dimensional measures. The
activities of any one country or individual have direct or
indirect environmental repercussions on others. Policies
must therefore be based on the recognition of global
interdependence and be guided by the principle of joint
responsibility: everybody must contribute, be it developed
or developing countries, international organizations or
the private sector, scientists, media or individual
citizens. The ongoing dilution of ideological divides may
facilitate the emergence of a one-world-conscience and
improve prospects for effective environmental action at
all levels towards a sustainable economy and
development.
4. In ethical terms, policies should be pursued that will
leave as much freedom as possible for subsequent
generations (and lesser developed countries) to allow them
to make their own choices. Yet, under conditions of global
interdependence, the long chain of interactions obscures
the consequences of individual actions and in the
industrialized world the choices become ever more
narrow.
5. To that end, a new morality and solidarity in
international relations, especially between industrialized
and developing countries, is called for. All nations must
be enjoined to assume their responsibility for the
promotion of a natural and social environment - shared by
all - that is both peaceful and healthy. As Pope John Paul
II stated: "The new industrialized States cannot, for
example, be asked to apply restrictive environmental
standards to their emerging industries unless the
industrialized States first apply them within their own
boundaries. At the same time, countries in the process of
industrialization are not morally free to repeat the
errors made in the past by others, and recklessly continue
to damage the environment through industrial pollutants,
radical deforestation or unlimited exploitation of
non-renewable resources."
6. The challenge of the decade of the 1990s is to
integrate environmental policies into economic policies
and to make traditional social-economic policy objectives
compatible with environment policy objectives. No real
conflict exists between environmental protection and
economic growth. There may be an analogy to the post-war
period, when the objectives of equity and efficiency had
to be reconciled in an effort to balance economic and
social policy objectives. More than any other policy,
environmental policy has to cope with an extremely
divergent set of variables. Hence, environmental policy
instruments have to meet the highest requirements with
respect to effectiveness and efficiency in order not to
thwart both traditional social-economic policy objectives
and objectives of environmental policy. To make these
objectives compatible, the formulation and implementation
of appropriate instruments and their combination will be
essential.
7. Current instruments are inadequately used to support
the process of reconciling the competing environment and
social-economic objectives. They provide policy makers,
planners, and investors with insufficient, often wrong
signals, incentives and definition of economic growth.
This calls for a reconsideration of the present use of
environmental policy instruments.
8. The concept of sustainable economic activity,
development and use of resources should be the overall
yardstick for future policies. Its application requires a
drastic change of perspective in the prevailing economic
system, the emergence of new models for the development of
developing and developed countries alike, intensified
research on operationalizing sustainable development, and
the adoption of coherent policies. The political process
has to set the dimensions and standards within which the
economic processes can work.
9. Although environment and development issues are
related, there is no exclusive relationship between
environment and development. But it must be recognized
that improvements in food supply, personal security,
health, national debt, human rights and illiteracy - which
are problems not directly associated with environmental
protection - will be conducive for environmental
protection indirectly. Especially in developing countries
and in Eastern Europe, peoples' participation in the
management and preservation of a country's resources will
be decisive for the sustainability of development efforts.
Projects without broad-based participation enhance
inequity and render development funding ineffective.
10. The present appearance of environmental problems as
externalities is a critical weakness of economic systems -
be they market or centrally planned economies - as it does
not induce environmentally benign behaviour and
activities. Appropriate measures, mechanisms and
incentives, such as charges, property rights and extended
liabilities must be devised and made part of the pricing
systems. No society can afford to have wrong relative
pricing as this will jeopardize sustainability. Prices
should not lie.
11. However, there are aspects of nature, such as
biodiversity, that do not lend themselves or cannot
appropriately be quantified and valued in the economic
system. In such cases, public decision-making and not the
market should decide about prices and values.
12. In market economies, the economic rationale has thus
far concentrated on economic transactions without taking
into consideration physical aspects. If the right
instruments are applied, the market system can be made
effective at environmental protection. By way of
precedent, the market has mitigated the energy crises of
the seventies by reducing demand and providing additional
supplies. In centrally planned economies, attempts are
being made to introduce market forces, but it will take
some time for incentives to be made effective.
13. Large investments may be required, e.g. for abatement
strategies to counter global warming trends, before gains
can be realized. On the other hand, the "cost" of
environmental conservation measures could be compensated
by a boost to investment from the adoption of new
conservation technologies; opportunities from extra
revenues; and the avoided costs from lessening of
pollution.
14. Public opinion and leaders must therefore be urgently
educated and informed about the opportunities and
consequences of integrating environmental policies in
social-economic policies. The media will have an important
role to play in this process. International organisations
should regularly, and on a priority basis, address these
issues.
TOWARDS A COMPLEMENTARITY OF ECOLOGY AND
ECONOMICS
THE CONCEPTUAL APPROACH
15. Nature performs three basic functions for humanity:
- it provides natural resources (raw materials, consumption goods, oil, food);
- it provides publicly shared goods of consumption (such as air, the ozone layer, scenic beauty, biodiversity, habitats);
- it is a receptacle of wastes (emissions).
The first role relates to resource availability. The two
other functions refer to the competing uses that exist
between the environment as a public good and/or a
receptacle of wastes. This establishes the scarcity of the
environment as a good. The binding constraint is thus not
only the resource availability and the limited
assimilative capacity of the environment.
16. The setting of targets for environmental quality
relate to the public good-aspect of the environment. They
must be determined through the political process in the
form of prices for emissions and for the use of scarce
resources. Policy instruments to deal with the receptacle
of wastes are private property rights (limits to
discharge, permits etc.) as well as waste charges.
17. There need not be a direct relationship between
economic growth and environmental degradation. In the
energy area, a direct correspondence between GNP growth
and primary energy demand became uncoupled in the wake of
the price rises during the two oil crises. Similarly,
feasible and appropriate economic incentives could
uncouple a direct relation between economic growth and
environmental degradation.
THE IMPORTANCE OF DECENTRALIZED APPROACHES
18. Environmental policy should be guided by the
subsidiary principle, according to which the most
efficient level should be chosen for policy
implementation. Many environmental issues will involve
global target-setting - i.e. uniform levels of
international principles and standards of environmental
safety and quality. Policy instruments should be
decentralized to the national level where they may most
effectively take account of the variety of political,
ecological and social circumstances, including the
different availability and capabilities of technology.
Industry and economic activities do not necessarily
require the same framework and conditions everywhere,
since differences in environmental endowment should be
seen like differences in the endowment with traditional
factors of production.
THE CHOICE OF EFFECTIVE INSTRUMENTS
19. It is essential to develop a consistent package of
incentives pointing in the same direction. Instruments of
environment policy can be
- regulatory measures, information disclosure and
communication; too many command-and-control measures may
however negatively affect investment and economic
growth;
- the inclusion of environmental costs in private
decision-making; priority should be given to economic
incentives (transferable permits, taxes, refund systems)
to be placed on emissions and on resources that stand as
proxies for later emissions. More generally, price
incentives have a major impact on demand and supply.
20. Environmental taxes and their levels should be
determined by value judgements emerging from the political
process and should become part of the general budget.
21. Leasable - as opposed to tradable - permits might be
an effective instrument to help stabilize and reduce
emissions without a permanent abandonment of emission or
pollution rights allocated to an individual, corporation
or nation. This would require that permit levels are
systematically reduced at regular periods. Such permits
may be particularly important if they are applied as an
international control mechanism. The leasability of
permits would ensure that one party obtaining additional
emission permits could not acquire a permanent right to
pollute above a district, national or world level.
22. As a matter of principle, especially in the energy
sector, all efforts should be made to avoid subsidies,
whether direct or indirect as they lead to distortions and
entail the waste of natural resources. At a minimum,
prices should reflect full incremental supply costs,
including the costs of adequate environmental controls.
Care must be taken that the impact of price increases
(resulting from the imposition of taxes or charges) on
income distribution and international competitiveness be
dealt with in a way that the money not be channelled back
to the polluters in the form of subsidies or specific tax
measures. It should be internationally accepted to
eliminate all subsidy programmes and other artificial
stimulus of energy use and other environmental goods.
23. Whenever possible, priority should be given to the
inclusion of environmental costs in private
decision-making through a system of economic incentive
instruments, such as charges on emissions, refund systems
and transferable permits. Only this approach is fully
compatible with the polluter-pay-principle which
establishes that - to the extent possible - environmental
costs should be internalized and charged to the polluter
instead of being compensated for by public subsidies. This
principle avoids price and trade distortions and
competitive injustice.
24. Market and non-market economies of industrialized
countries and developing countries require different
approaches:
- In market-oriented industrialized countries, the potential of economic instruments (prices, charges, taxes) and criteria must be extended beyond their current application. Policies should be guided by the principle that externalities should be internalized at the organizational level where pollution occurs, e.g. emissions at source. The marketable permit concept could be applied.
- In non-market economies, including the economies in transition, economic instruments have proved not to work effectively on the supply side because under a system of central planning, relying as it does on production targets, the price system cannot operate efficiently. Thus, it does not have the same allocational function as in market economies. Instead, a mechanism must be devised to hold individual production units liable for environmental costs so as to trigger appropriate reactions by firms and consumers. Otherwise, policy changes in Eastern Europe can at the present time primarily be brought about through an increase in public pressure and political pressure from the international community.
- In developing countries, the effectiveness of economic instruments must be examined in a context characterized by the dualism between the so-called modern sector and a vast informal sector. Maximum use should be made of general economic measures such as output prices and a re-examination and rationalization of existing structures of tariffs and subsidies (imposed in the course of industrialisation policies which proved to be very polluting).
25. As environmental problems are not of a short-term
nature, they cannot be solved through "crash programmes"
without enabling the market to function. Under certain
circumstances, however, such programmes may be justified
and inevitable, especially in enhancing institutional
infrastructure in developing countries to perform tasks
(such as sustainable forest management).
26. Special instruments must be devised to help preserve
biodiversity, the protection of which cannot be properly
ensured through the polluter-pay-principle and other
economic instruments, such as taxes. Instead, measures
could be developed taking into account three general
economic considerations:
- most species have a traditional value for pharmaceutical and food industries (traditional products are genetically improved and yield new qualities);
- the loss of material of any species would be irreplaceable from the ecological and biotechnological point of view;
- the preservation of mammals is an economic value in terms of tourism.
Quality levels, once defined, may not lead to marketable
purchases or the emergence of a price. Maybe the issue of
green bonds, whereby the value of biodiversity would be
expressed in economic terms, could be the beginning of a
market-oriented approach. The central question will be how
to arrive at a value and how to realize it. No drug
companies have, however, yet come forward with cash
preservation bids, maybe because biodiversity has been a
"free" good for decades. Only the Worldwide Fund for
Nature has recently pursued this idea. Aid donors should
be encouraged to examine this concept.
IMPROVING THE MEASUREMENT OF ECONOMIC PROGRESS
27. An important operational step toward integrating
ecology and economics and formulating appropriate policies
is to measure economic progress properly through revisions
in economic and social statistical and in corporate
accounting systems. Current economic accounting systems,
which evolved when natural resource limitations seemed
less pressing, should urgently be revised. Two changes
could be considered:
- natural resources for which economic values can be established should be treated as tangible capital in economic accounting frameworks; additions to stocks should be treated as capital formation, while depletion and degradation should be treated as capital consumption;
- pollution control and other identifiable "defensive expenditures" undertaken to prevent the loss of environmental services should be treated not as final expenditures but as intermediate costs, (i.e. the cost of generating a given level of goods and services) whether undertaken by government, households, or enterprises.
28. Environmental statistics produced by various countries
should be examined to see whether they can be improved,
harmonized or standardized for national and international
policy purposes. To that end, the Statistical Commission
of the United Nations should establish a work programme
aimed at incorporating resource and environmental
accounting revisions into the core system of national
accounts within a 3 to 5 year period. Especially OECD
countries should adopt such changes for their national
accounts. International financing institutions should
increase their assistance to developing countries
initiating resource accounting.
29. All countries should examine the experience of
countries using "satellite" national environmental
accounts (such as France and Norway), highlighting the
value and utility of such accounts to policy makers, with
a view to introducing such accounts and determining the
most useful form of presenting required data.
30. Future costs and benefits, if discounted in public
investment decisions, should reflect a societal valuation
of future welfare. Many governmental and
inter-governmental agencies use private market interest
rates for investment analysis. To reflect values more
accurately, two other approaches have been suggested: the
application of low discount rates and the use of option
values. For different reasons, both are controversial
among economists. Instead, a pragmatic approach might be
appropriate whereby, to the extent possible, environmental
effects should be given economic values. Where this is not
possible, the principle should be to adhere to safe
minimum standards, avoid risk, or place absolute
constraints on what should be done.
THE NEED FOR INTERNATIONAL CO-OPERATION AND
AGREEMENTS
31. All countries should strive towards an international
agreement, taking the form of a global climate framework
convention, to be concluded preferably by the time of the
1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development. A
global agreement on carbon emissions and necessary price
increases through charges may require entirely novel
approaches (e.g. an international system of leasable
emission permits) and it will have to be linked with the
issue of technical assistance and transfer of resources to
developing countries. In particular, it will require the
creation of a strong institutional framework to make such
a system politically realistic and credible. In a
step-by-step approach, separate sectoral protocols should
be negotiated, e.g. on CO2-efficient transport systems,
technology transfer, tropical forest protection and debt
relief for the sake of environmental protection.
The burden of such agreements must fall disproportionately
on industrialized countries. If global inequalities are to
diminish, developing countries must be allowed to
experience faster rates of economic development and energy
demand growth than the industrialized countries. It should
be recognized that even if reduction targets of greenhouse
gas emissions can be met, it will not be enough to reverse
climate change. Therefore, adjustment strategies to
climate change need to be developed and included in a
global climate convention and its protocols.
32. In the present phase of detente, all countries - but
especially the superpowers - should put emphasis on
converting personnel, technological and capital resources
from military to environmental protection. International
task forces of mutual assistance should be formed to
address the political problems of conversion. While
resources might become available through conversion, such
processes are costly, non-competitive and, in the case of
armaments destruction, itself damaging to the
environment.
33. To the extent possible, all countries should reduce
arms expenditures and a certain percentage of the
resources released ("peace dividend") should be
reallocated to environmental protection, research and
development into new technologies, and into a global
environment fund.
34. The member countries of the Conference on Security and
Co-operation in Europe (CSCE) could consider establishing
an environment protection agency and related bank, both
operating within the framework of the CSCE machinery. This
proposal could be considered at the next CSCE summit.
35. The following annexes contain a number of specific
economic proposals
- to tackle the problems of climate change;
- to deal with the problems of water, land and air; and
- to incorporate environmental dimensions in national and corporate decision-making.
ANNEX
I. MEASURES TO COMBAT CLIMATE CHANGE
1. The rate of warming of the earth, resulting from fossil
fuel release, deforestation and decay of organic matter
and the accumulation of heat-trapping gases in the
atmosphere, cannot be predicted with certainty. There are
strong indications, however, that the warming of the
earth's climate may soon affect the major vegetation
zones, agricultural productivity, sea level, the quantity
of water in river systems, and cause loss of species, an
irreparable decay of the world's cultural monuments, a
contamination of the seas and many other aspects of human
habitat. The risks of global warming are high enough to
warrant urgent steps to stop the further accumulation of
heat-trapping gases in order to stabilize the composition
of the atmosphere. The magnitude of reduction required may
be in the order of at least 3 billion tons of carbon stock
per year. Emissions from burning fossil fuels alone total
approximately 5.6 billion carbon tons per year while
deforestation releases up to 3 billion carbon tons per
year.
2. As a general step to address the complex problems of
climate change, national capabilities must be developed
for research, appropriate technology development,
abatement and coping strategies, particularly in
developing countries, and the mobilization of public
opinion as to the implications of present trends and the
risks of inaction.
3. Several abatement measures are possible to stabilize
the atmosphere:
a) a reduction in the use of fossil fuels and shifts
towards natural gas;
b) the vigorous promotion of energy efficiency;
c) limiting deforestation and launching extensive
reforestation programmes;
d) an accelerated phase-out of CFCs;
e) a massive programme of research and application of
renewable energies.
Taken alone, however, none will be adequate to bring about
the necessary magnitude of reduction. In 1989, the
InterAction Council had convened, under the chairmanship
of Mr. Pierre Elliot Trudeau, a High-level Expert Group on
Ecology and Energy Options which made specific
recommendations on possible abatement strategies in the
energy sector. In 1988, another High-level Expert Group,
led by Mr. Ola Ullsten, had examined Global Deforestation
Trends and also developed a series of concrete
recommendations.
4. A reduction in the accumulation of greenhouse gases
could be induced by a wide range of measures: technical
systems for prevention or reduction, regulatory systems of
command and control, and economic incentives (for
improvement) and disincentives (of continued
pollution).
5. The feasibility of a system of leasable carbon-use
permits should be considered - internationally and, where
feasible, also nationally - with an overall cap diminished
year by year in order to achieve a gradual phase-out of
fossil fuels as a major source of energy. Internationally,
leasable emission permits should initially be allocated on
the basis of adult population. Details of such a system
and its side effects should be closely studied, especially
the issues of national estimation, monitoring and
verification, effects on income distribution and its
international economic implications.
6. While a global agreement on carbon emissions, based on
a system of internationally leasable emission permits,
should be the ultimate aim, its conclusion may take
several years. Until then, immediate unilateral/national
and joint action (towards agreed reduction targets) even
by a limited number of countries - a "Climate Protection
Club" - would be desirable and economically rational. This
Club should comprise countries large in terms of
population and economy and include, at least, the United
States, the USSR, China, Japan, Brazil, India and the
countries of the European Community. They would also be in
a position to capture - both individually and collectively
- a substantial fraction of the benefits of their
abatement actions, although benefits may also be reaped by
smaller and other non-participating countries.
7. As part of rational policy, a tax on fossil (and
eventually nuclear) energy could be introduced to
discourage the use of such energy and to stimulate the
development of alternative sources of energy. Each country
- especially those with low average energy efficiencies -
should begin by voluntarily imposing a broadly-based
national energy tax in order to induce shifts in fuel mix
and encourage energy conservation.
8. The revenues from an energy tax could be used
- to finance sustained R&D programmes into the energy supply and demand, including renewable sources of energy and the role of conservation;
- to provide additional financial resources for special lending facilities to expand energy-related investments by developing and Eastern European countries;
- to foster the development of alternative sources of energy, especially solar energy, and for energy-efficient investments.
9. Policies to promote energy efficiency must permit
market forces to function effectively by ensuring that
people have sufficient information to make wise choices on
energy use, and by creating appropriate incentives.
10. Industrialized countries should agree to phase out
ozone-depleting gases by the end of the century. To that
end, charges on the use and production of such gases
should be introduced and developing countries should
receive financial and technical assistance to phase down
ozone-depleting gases more rapidly.
11. Policy mechanisms should be developed and appropriate
financial assistance provided for the most vulnerable
countries and communities affected by the impact of global
warming, e.g. sea level rise. OECD countries should assist
developing and Eastern European countries in taking
low-cost steps to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. In
particular, international financing institutions should be
encouraged to channel sharply increased financial and
technical resources into energy efficiency, renewable
energy systems, CFC substitutes, and forestry. The World
Bank and regional development banks should be encouraged
to develop special lending facilities to expand
investments in these fields and donor governments should
be prepared to channel resources through them.
12. Global knowledge and resources should be mobilized to
bring about the fixation of CO2, including its conversion
into other products, such as other hydrocarbons and
methanol. Care should be taken in this context that the
new products will not have any other undesirable
effects.
II. MEASURES TO PROTECT WATER, AIR AND SOIL
1. Current air, soil, ground and surface water
contamination calls for priority attention. Any measure
must be embedded in a concept of integrated policy
covering all environmental media. If the focus of
environmental policy were only on one medium, a danger
exists that the discharge of pollutants could be shifted
from one to another medium.
2. The availability of water is a basic condition and
requirement for human life. Yet water is increasingly
becoming scarce and being poisoned. In virtually all
countries, water is not treated as a scarce resource on
the mistaken notion that as a basic good it should be made
available virtually free. Although in most parts of the
world water resources are sufficient (if unevenly
distributed), problems arise from the inefficient use of
water both in quantitative and qualitative terms. It is
used recklessly as a receptacle for waste and for domestic
industrial and agriculture uses (farmers are the principal
users of water). A wise and efficient use of water could
be achieved through a proper set of incentives.
3. Water is being underpriced or not priced at all. The
approach to the pricing of water must be revised,
especially in agriculture.All costs related to the
provision of water (conveyance costs, capital investments
and maintenance of irrigation, drainage and other public
systems) must be included in the water price in order to
satisfy the principle of accurate pricing. Even if these
costs were incorporated, the water price would still not
reflect its environmental and economic price (e.g. the
cost of increasing salination and contamination of
rivers). Charges should therefore be applied to ensure a
proper relative price so that users become aware of the
costs. This should be accomplished in a gradual, not a one
step price increase. Proceeding from a floor price
applicable to all users, a differentiated system of water
prices may foster rational use, offering a premium on low
volume use and progressive prices for large quantities
used. Prices should also be high enough to discourage
certain wasteful uses (watering of streets, car wash). In
many countries, however, water is not even metered and
thus the basis for applying and enforcing charges is
lacking. Furthermore, as in the case of energy efficiency,
water saving mechanisms should be developed and
installed.
4. Water pricing policies may however conflict with social
objectives and policies. In most countries, people at the
poverty threshold would not have the means to pay for
rationally priced water and other resources. Thus, the
choice of appropriate mechanisms and instruments will be
essential to make environmental and social objectives
compatible. In policy terms, the fact that water is used
by poor people should not be an argument to make water
cheap. Prices should not be determined from the angle of
income policies. No country can afford to have wrong
relative pricing, as this would jeopardize sustainability.
Instead, some or all of the income raised from the
rational pricing of resources and other environmental
goods should be used for income support of the poorest
sections of the population to compensate for real income
losses. It should be guaranteed, however, that the bulk of
subsidies will not be captured by biggest users, which
would result in counterproductive effects and
reinforcement of inequities.
5. In general, the whole approach, network and
infrastructure of providing and managing water in Europe
and other continents will have to be re-examined. An
appropriate water price policy and the criterion of water
availability could also serve as an instrument to limit
the growth of human settlements, especially in developing
countries.
6. It must also be recognized that what appears to be in
many cases a subsidy for water is actually a subsidy for
food. An expansion of food production for a growing
population requires a substantial increase in irrigated
areas and yields of food. A rational pricing of water
would create either a serious food supply problem or food
price problem.
7. Transboundary pollution poses special problems. Acid
rain and river pollution are the most obvious cases. At
the international level there should be an agreement on
international diffusion norms (defining the ambient
quality of an environmental medium, such as a river, at a
borderline when entering seas or other countries).
Purification of the medium could be undertaken at such
borderlines.
8. Competition over access, management and use of fresh
water resources, e.g. international river systems or
lakes, shared by several countries is a major source of
potential conflict among nations. While in industrialized
countries, a number of agreements on quantity and quality
of water already exist (e.g. Rhine river, Lake Constance),
comparable agreements are lacking in Africa and the Middle
East limiting the possibility of pollution control and
rational water resource management. Agreements of this
type require special monitoring modalities both at the
macro and the micro levels. Where feasible, bi- or
multinational committees could be established to agree on
quality levels, especially salinity, and other management
issues.
9. The combat of desertification, prevalent in Africa,
Central Asia and the Andes of Latin America, is another
major challenge. Existing plans should be financed and
speedily implemented to ensure the minimum availability of
water resources in the countries concerned. Progress in
this area will also have beneficial human and social
effects, inasmuch as women in developing countries
currently have to migrate excessive distances in search
for clean water.
10. As regards hazardous waste, international efforts
should be strengthened to design waste minimization
technologies. Until such time and with the residual
wastes, the principle should be that waste should be
disposed at source, at the expense of either the polluter
or of those who benefit from the products concerned. Where
the transfer of waste across national boundaries is
necessary, it should take place under the strictest
regulation to avoid the illegal dumping of hazardous
substances at sea or their storage under dangerous
circumstances in developing countries. An international
conference for geologists should be convened to identify
international sites with the most stable geological
structure for storage of radioactive and other hazardous
waste.
III. MEASURES TO BE TAKEN AT THE INTERNATIONAL,
NATIONAL AND CORPORATE LEVELS
1. New and additional resources should be provided to
developing countries to help solve the principal
environmental problems of a global nature, even if this
were to imply a shift from other programmes. While
automaticity of resource flows would be desirable, it
might only be feasible if built into an institutionalized
leasable permit system (e.g. green bonds for
biodiversity).
2. Developed countries should be encouraged to provide
specific resources to developing countries for the purpose
of
a) information transfer concerning environmental
protection, including monitoring;
b) encouragement of afforestation;
c) ssistance in the adjustment of energy price
distortions;
d) the transfer of energy efficiency technological
know-how;
e) manpower development and training;
f) national resource accounting and reporting.
3. If developing countries continue to use old
technologies and lack access to new technologies, all
action by industrialized countries to tackle environmental
problems will be undermined. Thus, it must be in the
interest of all countries to ensure the transfer of new
environmentally benign, energy-saving technologies to
developing countries. While such technologies may
initially be more expensive, developing countries should
not be asked to pay more than the marginal cost as
otherwise the very corporations and countries that may
have caused the global problems in the first place would
be rewarded. Given the shared interest in solving the
problem, a case can be made for sharing the costs, too.
Thus, mechanisms should be devised to compensate - within
an internationally agreed system - for intellectual
property rights of private corporations so as not to
stifle private research (e.g. investment and research
subsidies). The damage costs of non-transfer of such
technologies would likely be higher than the substitute
costs of such a mechanism.
In this context, developing countries have advanced the
concept of an "ecological debt" incurred by the developed
countries over decades and centuries as a result of their
consumption and production patterns, which could be offset
through the transfer (at cost) of technologies now
required. Also, the idea has been proposed to ensure
technology through green bonds on biodiversity.
4. Developed and developing countries should co-operate in
the design of new tropical products, using clean energy in
their production, avoiding negative environmental effects
during production and consumption and securing appropriate
levels of revenue.
5. Capital-importing countries should create more
favorable conditions for private capital flows to
developing countries. For heavily-indebted countries, this
means restoring credit-worthiness, in large part by
formulating - with the assistance of the World Bank, the
IMF and other international financial institutions - new
elements for structural adjustment programmes that include
policy modifications aimed at the elimination of wasteful
and unsustainable exploitation of natural resources (e.g.
through raising of resource prices and elimination of
public subsidies and expenditures that exacerbate
environmental damages). Governments should ensure that the
multilateral development banks and the IMF take full
account of such opportunities in their structural and
sectoral adjustment lending.
6. The World Bank and regional development banks should be
encouraged to continue with their fledgling efforts to
channel additional resources to high priority natural
resource management projects, especially to protect
biological diversity, tropical forests, regional seas, and
the global atmosphere. Given the limits on members'
borrowing capacities and the fact that benefits from
investments in these fields are not fully captured by the
borrowing country, it is welcome that such loans have
already been given on concessional terms. Member countries
should support these initiatives and promote greater
cooperation among development banks in that regard.
7. Governments should also require that multilateral
development banks and international private banks apply
the same level of environmental assessment for all large
industrial and public sector loans.
8. An international congress should be convened to develop
proposals for
a) generally accepted accounting principles for valuing
natural resources and adverse impacts of environmental
emissions;
b) generally accepted accounting principles for use by
corporations to record environmental costs;
c) target levels of greenhouse gas emissions and
allocations for participating nations (proceeding from
existing baseline levels or the avoidance of increased
levels);
d) major research and development programs to address:
- development and deployment of non-fossil-fuel energy sources;
- technical systems for controlling CO2, methane, NOx and CFC emissions;
- technical systems for restoring the balance between CO2 emissions and plant/ocean uptake of CO2;
e) the introduction of option values and a related
increase in resource flows to developing countries.
9. Countries could consider an environmental tax reform in
which - over a gradual period of 10, 20 or even 30 years -
a major part of the tax burden would be taken away from
labor and capital and shifted to resource and energy
consumption and pollution.
10. Given the potential relationship between environmental
policies and trade distortions, GATT should initiate
discussions how - in line with article 20 - environmental
criteria and health and safety standards could be adopted
by countries without the presumption of creating
non-tariff barriers to trade. Further, GATT should create
a standing environmental working group to support national
efforts to reduce the generation of greenhouse gases.
11. Feedback systems should be introduced to provide
governments, industries and other institutions with
evidence that progress towards environmental goals is
being achieved or with early warning that mid-course
corrections are needed. Such feedback systems could
include publicly reported environmental audit information
from industries.
12. Governments should prompt major changes in corporate
accounting and reporting to require the segmentation of
environmental expenditures and encourage constructive
environmental practices by individual firms. To that end,
an international panel should be established to formulate
uniform annual corporate disclosure practices for
transnational corporations and other large enterprises on
the environmental impact of their activities,
concentrating initially on monitoring standards for
greenhouse gases, the generation of hazardous wastes and
the contents of accident prevention plans and later on the
quantity of national resources used, the volume and types
of emissions generated and plans for increasing energy
efficiency over the next five years. In that context, the
concept of value pricing of raw materials should be
applied in order to include the diminishing of capital
wealth and the cost of dealing with environmental
consequences.
13. In keeping with the subsidiary principle, corporations
should set policy in a centralized way but implement it in
a decentralized manner.
14. Recent trends in the US, Europe and elsewhere in
regard to the legal liability of large and especially
transnational companies should be examined with a view to
increasing their responsibility for environmentally-safe
sourcing, use and disposal of products.
15. Governments and private institutions should embark on
a continuous programme of awareness training aimed at
teaching about the risks of continued environmental
deterioration.